- Rankings
- WIPR Insights
Jurisdiction Reports
Refine Search
Jurisdiction reports
On July 2, 2013, Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court held a public hearing of a patent infringement case in which Zhizhen Technology Inc of Shanghai sued Apple Inc and Apple Computer Trading (Shanghai) Co Ltd. 1 September 2013
Jurisdiction reports
Historically, the UK has taken a relatively narrow approach to the implementation of the governing EU Directives on statutory copyright exemptions. 1 September 2013
Jurisdiction reports
Actively dealing with infringement is vital when dealing with IP. There should be actual rights to enforce. Indiscriminate claims purporting infringement of a patent or other IP rights are prohibited. 1 September 2013
Jurisdiction reports
On August 3, President Obama’s administration did the unexpected. A Samsung legal victory was destroyed by the administration’s vetoing of a US International Trade Commission ban on the import and sale of a number of Apple’s iPhones and iPads. 1 September 2013
Jurisdiction reports
The requirement of genuine use is assessed strictly in both national and European trademark practice. Use without registration can also provide certain rights to the users. 1 September 2013
Jurisdiction reports
In Germany, as in many other European jurisdictions, claimants may not only rely on registered design rights in order to attack pirated or otherwise copied products. 1 September 2013
Jurisdiction reports
The Brazilian government has been attacking the intellectual protection afforded by the WTO TRIPS Agreement to the research-based pharmaceutical industry. 1 September 2013
Jurisdiction reports
The American sports equipment company, Icon Health & Fitness won a declaratory judgment on entitlement to a utility model patent application for a multi-function body training apparatus at the second instance of the IP court. 1 September 2013
Jurisdiction reports
The Malaysian position with respect to industrial designs has finally caught up with other international jurisdictions. 1 September 2013
Jurisdiction reports
It is an obligation of trademark holders to use their trademarks as they were granted by the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property or with slight modifications that do not alter their distinctive character, in order not to be subject to a cancellation action grounded in non-use. 1 September 2013
Not finding what you're looking for, please try resetting your applied search and filters,
or try the full site search.