- Rankings
- WIPR Insights
Jurisdiction Reports
Refine search
Jurisdiction reports
Environmental and natural resource preservation has become an important issue for governments. 1 April 2014
Jurisdiction reports
It would be good to think that intellectual property law and regulations in Mexico cover all the aspects and possible issues that might arise from their own provisions, but that is not the case. 1 April 2014
Jurisdiction reports
As well as the discussions in the Japan Patent Office (JPO) about changing Japan’s patent law, described in my last WIPR report, there have also been talks in the JPO about changing Japan’s design law, based on the Japan Patent Office Annual Report 2013. 1 April 2014
Jurisdiction reports
After years of debate and extensive discussion, the Canadian government tabled five international IP treaties in the House of Commons—all on one day. 1 April 2014
Jurisdiction reports
The Internet has thrown protection of copyright into a whole new dimension. 1 April 2014
Jurisdiction reports
Flattering news for Peru: it took fifth place in the first Country Brand Index Latin America study launched by brand consultant FutureBrand, which describes its report as “the world’s largest and longest standing global study of country brand perception”. 1 April 2014
Jurisdiction reports
The Turkish Ministry of Customs and Commerce published a communiqué in the Official Gazette on February 14 intended to introduce guidelines for the substance of company trade names and for individual tradespeople operating commercial enterprises. 1 April 2014
Jurisdiction reports
The Finnish Market Court started to operate as the new IP court on September 1, 2013. 1 April 2014
Jurisdiction reports
Preliminary discussions took place in the Japan Patent Office (JPO) in 2013 to change Japan’s patent law, based on the report entitled Toward Early Acquisition of Strong and Stable Patent Rights and Improvement of User-Friendliness, issued by the JPO’s Patent System Subcommittee in February 2013. 1 February 2014
Jurisdiction reports
A landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Canada has been released which will serve as an important precedent in many fundamental areas of Canadian copyright law, including the test for determining if a “substantial part” of a work has been copied, assessment of damages, use of experts in a copyright context and the vicarious liability of directors for infringement. 1 February 2014
Not finding what you're looking for, please try resetting your applied search and filters,
or try the full site search.