- Rankings
- WIPR Insights
Jurisdiction Reports
Refine search
Jurisdiction reports
Since mid-2009, Canada has been participating in negotiations with the European Union towards an economic partnership agreement known as the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement. 1 June 2010
Jurisdiction reports
Engagement in the international intellectual property family has played an active role in the rapid and sound development of China’s own IP system, as statistics show. 1 June 2010
Jurisdiction reports
A Hungarian pharmaceutical company filed a trademark application for a colour/figurative use of the word ‘MultiKid’ with a list of goods. 1 June 2010
Jurisdiction reports
In a much-anticipated development, Israel is to accede to the Madrid Protocol on September 1, 2010. This will make it easier and cheaper for foreign entities to register marks in Israel. 1 June 2010
Jurisdiction reports
The Ministry of Domestic Trade, Cooperatives & Consumerism (MDTCC) has recently looked into reviewing all IP acts in Malaysia. 1 June 2010
Jurisdiction reports
Brazil’s President Lula has enacted Provisional Measure No. 482, providing statutory authority to government agencies to issue compulsory licences, expropriate IP rights and suspend the obligation to maintain an IP regime with minimum standards, as provided by the TRIPs agreement. 1 April 2010
Jurisdiction reports
The new Implementing Regulations of the Chinese Patent Law became effective on February 1, 2010, together with the new Guidelines for Examination. 1 April 2010
Jurisdiction reports
On December 1, 2009, the Supreme Court of Denmark, as the second instance body, ruled in a case settling a dispute over the copyright to a computer program. 1 April 2010
Jurisdiction reports
A new decision by Germany’s Federal Supreme Court sheds further light on what measures may be taken to protect the confidentiality interests of parties affected by court orders authorising the inspection of devices on their business premises. 1 April 2010
Jurisdiction reports
In a recent judgment, the Appeal Court of Budapest confirmed the judgment of the Metropolitan Court of Budapest and clarified the meaning and interpretation of the term ‘enrichment’—the compensation awarded to a patentee following a defendant’s infringing business activity. 1 April 2010
Not finding what you're looking for, please try resetting your applied search and filters,
or try the full site search.