- Rankings
- WIPR Insights
Jurisdiction Reports
Refine Search
Jurisdiction reports
On February 6, 2013, the State Intellectual Property Office of China (SIPO) published a draft amendment to the Guidelines for Examination, soliciting public comments. 1 April 2013
Jurisdiction reports
Several interesting decisions in intellectual property law have been seen in India since the last report, making it difficult to select reportable cases. We have picked out two that are likely to have a big impact. 1 April 2013
Jurisdiction reports
Where there’s a patent, there’s always the question of how to interpret that patent. The answer seems simple: just check the patent and you’ll know what is protected and what is infringing. But reality shows that the interpretation of a patent is serious business. 1 April 2013
Jurisdiction reports
Peruvian law provides two ways to obtain protection against the misuse of registered trademarks. 1 April 2013
Jurisdiction reports
An Act Amending Certain Provisions of Republic Act No 8293, otherwise known as the Intellectual Property Act of the Philippines, was signed into law on February 28, 2013. 1 April 2013
Jurisdiction reports
On February 20, 2013, the US Supreme Court surprised many members of the US bar by holding in the decision of Gunn v Minton that federal courts do not have exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over claims asserting patent malpractice. 1 April 2013
Jurisdiction reports
Significant changes to both the Canadian Trade-marks Act and the Copyright Act may be coming in the near future. 1 April 2013
Jurisdiction reports
In the case of Ho Tack Sien & Ors v Rotta Research Laboratorium SpA & Anor, the respondent manufactured a drug called Viartril-S (glucosamine sulphate) used in the treatment of osteoarthritis. 1 April 2013
Jurisdiction reports
The European Patent Convention (EPC) gives an applicant the possibility of dividing a pending European application by filing one or more divisional applications, which can be divided further. 1 April 2013
Jurisdiction reports
Germany’s Federal Supreme Court currently hands down an unusually high number of decisions dealing with matters of design law, well above the average handed down since the new German Designs Act and the CDR took effect in 2004 and 2003, respectively. 1 February 2013
Not finding what you're looking for, please try resetting your applied search and filters,
or try the full site search.