9 June 2023FeaturesTrademarksMuireann Bolger

Dogfight: SCOTUS favours big brands in JD’s First Amendment clash

As the US Supreme Court finally delivered its decision on the high-profile Bad Spaniels case this week, many established brand owners across the US are likely to be breathing a sigh of relief.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

SCOTUS told: don’t ‘muzzle’ free speech for Jack Daniel’s

21 February 2023 US’ highest court set to hear arguments in a key dispute concerning the interplay between freedom of expression and trademark law | Bad Spaniels parody borrowed “only enough to make the joke work” claims writ | Harvard University Law | Potomac Law.

Trademarks

Why ‘Trump too small’ could be a big deal for the Trademarks Act

15 June 2023 The former US president is facing a trial and potential prison time, but is he also the subject of a trademark dispute that could have profound implications for the Lanham Act?

Trademarks

Why SCOTUS' ‘narrow path’ in Spaniels could cause ripples

23 June 2023 The landmark Jack Daniel’s case involving a dog toy leaves questions over the Rogers test and could see a shift in infringement standards, says Mark Stallion of Greensfelder.

Propel Fuels seeks top-up damages of $1.2bn in secrets case

Leading US trademark firms and lawyers recognised in new national rankings

E.l.f cleared of copycat claims in spat with Benefit Cosmetics

Lenovo faces US import ban as ITC sides with Ericsson

Samsara v Motive: ‘Secrets case reads like a pulp novel’

USPTO sanctions attorney over sham Chinese TM filings

Aldi v Thatchers: Will UK appeal finally herd the copycats?

Peanut the squirrel (RIP) leaps on the meme coin bandwagon

Dogfight: SCOTUS favours big brands in JD’s First Amendment clash

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles