21 February 2023TrademarksMuireann Bolger

SCOTUS told: don’t ‘muzzle’ free speech for Jack Daniel’s

US’ highest court set to hear arguments in a key dispute concerning the interplay between freedom of expression and trademark law | Bad Spaniels parody borrowed “only enough to make the joke work” claims writ | Harvard University Law | Potomac Law.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

Dogfight: SCOTUS favours big brands in JD’s First Amendment clash

9 June 2023 The Bad Spaniels case pitted the might of America Inc against a core principle of the US Constitution. Now that the country’s highest court has weighed in, what does this mean for brands?

Trademarks

'Satan shoes' creator wades into Jack Daniel’s toy quarrel

24 February 2023 Art collective has history of legal battles with powerful brands | Prominent Harvard law academic also opposes Jack Daniels’ position | International Trademark Association | Nike | Vans.

Trademarks

SCOTUS picks at bones of Jack Daniel’s dog toy dispute

24 March 2023 Justices concerned that trademark claims potentially impair free expression | Marked reluctance to discard Rogers test | VIP Products and free speech advocates favour Rogers over likelihood-of-confusion analysis.

On our radar...

Penn State prevails in trademark dispute with Vintage Brand over retro logos

Google: Ex-engineer ‘touted dominion over the trade secrets he stole’

Tourism’s influence on defining the ‘relevant public’ in EUTM oppositions

‘Trade secrets can be emotional’: Seth Gerber, Morgan Lewis

Private equity eyes controlling interest in Anaqua

Motorola can’t enforce ‘multiple’ US Hytera damages in UK

UK firms Venner Shipley and AA Thornton combine

SCOTUS told: don’t ‘muzzle’ free speech for Jack Daniel’s

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles