shutterstock_410385895_monticello
7 December 2022FeaturesTrademarksJulia Anne Matheson

Jack Daniel’s: Ninth Circuit's decision causes headaches

Americans love their dogs, their whiskey, and the First Amendment. In combination, these elements form the framework of one of the most consequential trademark cases to reach the US Supreme Court in nearly a decade, namely, Jack Daniel’s Properties v VIP Products.  SCOTUS is charged with resolving a split amongst the Circuit Courts (eg, the 9th Circuit versus everyone else) regarding the appropriate legal analysis to apply in evaluating trademark infringement claims involving commercial products with some parodic aka “expressive” content.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Trademarks
20 January 2023   US government claims an appeals court erred in an earlier judgment that favoured opposition | Lanham Act "incorrectly" applied in parody dog toy dispute | Case could create a “sea change” for trademark cases.
Trademarks
21 February 2023   US’ highest court set to hear arguments in a key dispute concerning the interplay between freedom of expression and trademark law | Bad Spaniels parody borrowed “only enough to make the joke work” claims writ | Harvard University Law | Potomac Law.
Trademarks
24 February 2023   Art collective has history of legal battles with powerful brands | Prominent Harvard law academic also opposes Jack Daniels’ position | International Trademark Association | Nike | Vans.