• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Aereo case reaches Supreme Court
22 April 2014Copyright

Aereo case reaches Supreme Court

The US Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in a dispute that will decide whether TV streaming service Aereo infringes copyright.

Arguments in the case, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc, will begin this morning, April 22, at the court in Washington, DC.

Aereo captures TV broadcasts and retransmits them over the internet, allowing subscribers to watch and record live programmes.

Its subscribers pay between $8 and $12 a month for the service but Aereo does not pay licensing fees to the original broadcasters.

Several US broadcasters, including ABC and Fox, have claimed the service infringes their copyright.

The court agreed to hear the case in January this year when the broadcasters filed a petition for writ of certiorari following a ruling from the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that backed Aereo and rejected calls for a preliminary injunction against it.

In their writ, the broadcasters have asked the Supreme Court to consider one question: “Whether a company ‘publicly performs’ a copyrighted television program when it retransmits a broadcast of that program to thousands of paid subscribers over the internet”.

However, in a pre-trial brief submitted last month, Aereo denied its performances were public and that therefore they do not infringe copyright.

“Although a ‘performance’ occurs when a consumer uses Aereo’s technology, that performance is ‘private’ and therefore lawful,” Aereo said, claiming the broadcasters’ arguments had “no merit”.

Last month, the US government threw its hat into the ring when it filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court, claiming the Aereo model “clearly infringes” copyright.

A final decision is not expected until June.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
Aereo case argued in Supreme Court
23 April 2014   The US Supreme Court has heard oral arguments in a long-awaited case that will decide whether a TV streaming service infringes copyright.


Editor's picks

A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
Patents
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
20 June 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
20 June 2025
Future of IP
‘Sad beige’ lawsuit shows how hard it is for influencers to stand out
20 June 2025
Trademarks
Creative licence: Inside the LEGO Group’s Asia playbook
16 June 2025
Copyright
‘Cynical and bewildering’: UK omits copyright protections in Data Bill
13 June 2025
Patents
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
11 June 2025
AI
Getty slams Stability’s ‘distorted AI rubbish’ in opening arguments
10 June 2025

More articles

Tech litigators join Hogan Lovells’ Paris practice from A&O Shearman
Getty v Stability AI: Five takeaways from the courtroom so far
Getty drops primary copyright claims against Stability AI
Defending the realm: How a key MoD supplier crafts its IP strategy
How IP firms can champion LGBTQ+ staff beyond Pride 2025
WATCH: Section 112 – Where has the dust settled?
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin