• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
    • INTA 2026
  • Trademarks
  • In-house
  • Patents
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Global In-House Elite 2026
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2026
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Aereo case reaches Supreme Court
22 April 2014Copyright

Aereo case reaches Supreme Court

The US Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in a dispute that will decide whether TV streaming service Aereo infringes copyright.

Arguments in the case, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc, will begin this morning, April 22, at the court in Washington, DC.

Aereo captures TV broadcasts and retransmits them over the internet, allowing subscribers to watch and record live programmes.

Its subscribers pay between $8 and $12 a month for the service but Aereo does not pay licensing fees to the original broadcasters.

Several US broadcasters, including ABC and Fox, have claimed the service infringes their copyright.

The court agreed to hear the case in January this year when the broadcasters filed a petition for writ of certiorari following a ruling from the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that backed Aereo and rejected calls for a preliminary injunction against it.

In their writ, the broadcasters have asked the Supreme Court to consider one question: “Whether a company ‘publicly performs’ a copyrighted television program when it retransmits a broadcast of that program to thousands of paid subscribers over the internet”.

However, in a pre-trial brief submitted last month, Aereo denied its performances were public and that therefore they do not infringe copyright.

“Although a ‘performance’ occurs when a consumer uses Aereo’s technology, that performance is ‘private’ and therefore lawful,” Aereo said, claiming the broadcasters’ arguments had “no merit”.

Last month, the US government threw its hat into the ring when it filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court, claiming the Aereo model “clearly infringes” copyright.

A final decision is not expected until June.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
Aereo case argued in Supreme Court
23 April 2014   The US Supreme Court has heard oral arguments in a long-awaited case that will decide whether a TV streaming service infringes copyright.


Editor's picks

Lamborghini reveals the hidden race to protect supercar secrecy
Trademarks
Lamborghini reveals the hidden race to protect supercar secrecy
22 May 2026

Editor's picks

Trademarks
Lamborghini reveals the hidden race to protect supercar secrecy
22 May 2026
Patents
US patent rift laid bare in Vidal’s letter to European Commission
20 May 2026
Trademarks
Hoka 'curbs' competition law in major win for brand owners
18 May 2026
Patents
Why Tesla is ‘forum shopping’ using InterDigital’s UK assets
13 May 2026
Trademarks
Inside INTA London and the IP ‘carnival’
11 May 2026
Trademarks
Siren call: Starbucks’ IP chief on safeguarding a global brand
6 May 2026

More articles

Faegre Drinker gains high-tech litigator from Winston & Strawn
Kirkland & Ellis subject of alleged conflict in trade secrets clash
US patent rift laid bare in Vidal’s letter to European Commission
Withers expands trademark and copyright practice with New York hire
Domino’s among six major chains sued over online ordering technology
Kilpatrick adds to patent litigation team in San Francisco
Inside INTA London and the IP ‘carnival’
Samsung hit with $15m lawsuit over Dua Lipa’s image on TV boxes

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin