3 July 2019Copyright

Andy Warhol Prince ruling ‘unsurprising’, say lawyers

A ruling that a series of illustrations of late musician Prince by artist Andy Warhol are transformative and do not infringe a photographer’s copyright followed previous arguments made by the courts, said lawyers.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

SCOTUS to examine fair use in Warhol ‘Prince Series’ case

29 March 2022 The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments on whether Andy Warhol’s “Prince Series” infringed a photographer's copyright, the outcome of which could change the law on ‘far use’.

Supreme Court asked to review Warhol ‘Prince’ judgment

10 December 2021 The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts has asked the US Supreme Court to review the Second Circuit’s ruling that the late artist’s “Prince Series” infringed a photographer’s copyright.

Second Circuit says Google v Oracle does not impact Prince judgment

25 August 2021 The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has refused to alter its ruling that Andy Warhol’s art series based on photos of the musician Prince infringed the original photographer’s copyright.

Apple presses court to probe OpenAI’s mystery hardware

K&L Gates hires six-partner team of IP and corporate lawyers from Pillsbury

Victoria’s Secret sues Thomas Pink over ‘radical style drift’ in TM clash

Samsung labels Dua Lipa’s $15m TM claim over TV boxes ‘legally defective’

Perfect Pitch: Inside the scheme that gets junior lawyers selling to clients

Munger, Tolles & Olson enlists ex-Paul Hastings trial litigator

Via Licensing’s new data centre patent pool opens for business

Surviving the new AI prosecution gauntlet

Andy Warhol Prince ruling ‘unsurprising’, say lawyers

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles