13 October 2023FeaturesJurisdiction reportsManisha Singh and Akanksha Kar
Resilience rewarded in appeal
The issue relevant to Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act (‘the Act’) arose when a suit filed by PhonePe (PPL) was pending adjudication before the Delhi High Court. RIPL had objected to the validity of PPL’s trademarks and the court was yet to frame the issue in this regard.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
21 October 2020 The Delhi High Court has ordered e-commerce company Flipkart to remove listings advertising and selling products which violate toymaker Mattel’s copyright in six characters.
13 May 2020 The Delhi High Court has suspended next week’s deadline for filings at the Indian IP office, in a win for IP lawyers who said it violated an order of the country’s Supreme Court.
23 December 2024 WIPR has published Trademarks Rankings for this year highlighting top firms and practitioners in the US | New firms included in 2024 listing which covers contentious and non-contentious work.