Taiwan jurisdiction report: Commercial success finally proves sweet
The seminal IP Court decision was rendered for a patent invalidation dispute, in which a utility model (UM) for “a heat preservation cover for food” had been challenged, and later declared by the IP Office, as lacking inventive step in view of two prior art patents. As in many invalidation actions, the main issue contended by the parties before the IP Office was whether there would have been adequate motivation to combine the prior art features to arrive at the disputed UM. The IP Office’s answer was in the affirmative.
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk