olegalbinsky-istockphoto-com-us-supreme-court--1

24 April 2018Patents

US Supreme Court holds IPRs to be constitutional

Inter partes reviews (IPRs) do not violate the US Constitution and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board has authority to invalidate patents.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

IPRs are constitutional, US government claims

25 October 2017 The US acting solicitor general has weighed in on a case being mulled over by the US Supreme Court over whether inter partes reviews (IPRs) are constitutional.

Patents

SCOTUS Oil States decision may raise more challenges to IPR: lawyers

25 April 2018 The US Supreme Court yesterday confirmed that inter partes reviews do not violate the US Constitution, but lawyers have told WIPR that more challenges to the IPR should be expected.

Patents

US Supreme Court SAS ruling: a ‘mess’ for IPRs

25 April 2018 Limiting the discretion of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in relation to inter partes reviews is a game-changing decision which creates a procedural “mess”, one lawyer has claimed.

Huawei wins seven-country ban on Netgear routers at the UPC

Propel Fuels seeks top-up damages of $1.2bn in secrets case

Leading US trademark firms and lawyers recognised in new national rankings

Lenovo faces US import ban as ITC sides with Ericsson

Samsara v Motive: ‘Secrets case reads like a pulp novel’

USPTO sanctions attorney over sham Chinese TM filings

Arusha Protocol takes root: Fresh growth for plant variety protection in Africa

Peanut the squirrel (RIP) leaps on the meme coin bandwagon

US Supreme Court holds IPRs to be constitutional

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles