olegalbinsky-istockphoto-com-us-supreme-court--1

24 April 2018Patents

US Supreme Court holds IPRs to be constitutional

Inter partes reviews (IPRs) do not violate the US Constitution and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board has authority to invalidate patents.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

IPRs are constitutional, US government claims

25 October 2017 The US acting solicitor general has weighed in on a case being mulled over by the US Supreme Court over whether inter partes reviews (IPRs) are constitutional.

Patents

SCOTUS Oil States decision may raise more challenges to IPR: lawyers

25 April 2018 The US Supreme Court yesterday confirmed that inter partes reviews do not violate the US Constitution, but lawyers have told WIPR that more challenges to the IPR should be expected.

Patents

US Supreme Court SAS ruling: a ‘mess’ for IPRs

25 April 2018 Limiting the discretion of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in relation to inter partes reviews is a game-changing decision which creates a procedural “mess”, one lawyer has claimed.

Former executive ‘stole secret flavour formula’ for global drinks brand

UPC docs 'excessively redacted' under GDPR claims transparency lawyer

INTA announces 2025 president, updates TM guidelines, launches new 'Think Tank'

L'Oréal sued over virtual makeup try-on simulator

Kathi Vidal to leave USPTO ahead of incoming Trump administration

Huawei moves to strike out US trade secrets and fraud allegations

Q&A: EagleView counsel maps out route to IPR victory

Herbert Smith Freehills and Kramer Levin in $2bn merger talks

US Supreme Court holds IPRs to be constitutional

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles