Counsel Q&A: Why our rival’s Alice claims didn’t make the cut

A recent decision involving digital animation and image editing technology has highlighted the importance of stronger patent claims, explains Robert Greeson of Norton Rose Fulbright, who led the winning trial team.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

PTAB invalidates fintech patent in Alice challenge

21 September 2021 The US Patent Trial and Appeal Board has invalidated the majority of claims of a Swedish company’s fintech patent under Alice, and rejected a motion to amend the claims.

Patents

AUTM: An uneven playing field in the wake of Alice

23 May 2016 The two-part Alice test on patent subject matter eligibility means patent owners and licensors face severe and potentially overwhelming obstacles in the licensing playing field, argues Eric Guttag, chair of the public policy legal task force of the Association of University Technology Managers.

Penn State prevails in trademark dispute with Vintage Brand over retro logos

Google: Ex-engineer ‘touted dominion over the trade secrets he stole’

‘Trade secrets can be emotional’: Seth Gerber, Morgan Lewis

Private equity eyes controlling interest in Anaqua

Motorola can’t enforce ‘multiple’ US Hytera damages in UK

UK firms Venner Shipley and AA Thornton combine

Kathi Vidal to rejoin previous firm as partner following USPTO departure

‘We were on tenterhooks’: Winning counsel dives into WaterRower

Counsel Q&A: Why our rival’s Alice claims didn’t make the cut

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles