shutterstock_678583375_peshkova
14 October 2021PatentsDavid Brinck

DABUS: AI missed opportunity?

The judgment by the English Court of Appeal regarding the DABUS case, addressing the patenting of inventions “invented” by artificial intelligence (AI), is distinguished by a dissenting judgment by Lord Justice Birss that on one hand criticises the arguments presented by appellant for the patenting of such inventions, and on the other hand, sets out arguments why the patenting of such inventions is compatible with current legislation in the UK.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
14 January 2022   The application of artificial intelligence to an IP team can dramatically improve results, explains Peter Erdödy of Dennemeyer Octimine.
Patents
6 April 2022   A new referral to the European Patent Office’s enlarged board of appeal will determine whether post-filed data can be used to support inventive steps in patentability, as Sarah Gibbs of Appleyard Lees reports.
Patents
13 April 2022   The Federal Court of Australia has overturned its prior ruling that artificial intelligence (AI) can be a named inventor on a patent application, striking down the last year’s surprising win for Stephen Thaler and his ongoing AI inventorship campaign.