Has Justice Birss found a route for AI inventorship?
After a string of losses at the world’s top IP courts, it seemed as if the artificial intelligence (AI) machine, “the device for the autonomous bootstrapping of unified sentience”—better known by its acronym, DABUS, had run out of road.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
9 February 2022 The popular text correction software must navigate the nuances around patenting language processing systems, explain Parminder Lally and Simon Ambroz of Appleyard Lees.
16 August 2022 The Federal Circuit’s decision on AI inventorship affirms the rule that requires an inventor to be a human, explains Frank DeCosta of Finnegan.