There is a misperception among many that the identification and naming of inventors is less significant than they actually are. The threshold question as to who actually conceived a patent’s underlying invention is paramount. Under US law, determining such conception is often complex and does not lend itself to mathematical-type formulation.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
23 September 2020 Physicist Stephen Thaler has failed in his bid to establish his creativity machine, Dabus, as an inventor under the Patent Act, following the dismissal of his appeal by the English High Court.
18 November 2024 Following the High Court’s long-awaited WaterRower decision, WIPR met with Rachel Pearse of Gunnercooke, part of the winning team, to explore what the “fascinating” case means for designers.