On May 5, 2020, the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) issued a fundamental and highly anticipated decision on the particularities of enforcing standard essential patents (SEPs) in Germany. It was the first time that the BGH had the opportunity to comment on important practical issues that arose from the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) landmark 2015 decision in Huawei v ZTE.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
7 May 2020 Sisvel is claiming victory over Haier after a final German Federal Court of Justice ruling, which the patent pool operator said is a win for standard-essential patent (SEP) owners against “efficient infringement” strategies.
3 July 2020 The German Federal Court of Justice’s judgment in Sisvel v Haier establishes a more pro-patent owner standard for FRAND licensing negotiations than seen in Germany before, argued lawyers for Sisvel.