shutterstock_1218220324_everything_possible
12 April 2021PatentsMauricio Uribe

The end of the DABUS affair?

An April 6, 2021, summary judgment hearing before Judge Leonie Brinkema in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia likely brings an end to the global saga brought by Stephen Thaler to challenge the very notion of inventorship of patent applications, and perhaps the larger notion of whether a computer software entity can have property rights.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
24 August 2020   IP decisions made about Dabus—a “creativity machine”—are likely to accelerate legislative consideration of the patentability of inventions by AI. For now, those using AI in innovation should consider what kind of human involvement suffices for a patent, and consider alternative forms of protection, says Matt Hervey, head of artificial intelligence at Gowling WLG.
Patents
23 September 2020   Physicist Stephen Thaler has failed in his bid to establish his creativity machine, Dabus, as an inventor under the Patent Act, following the dismissal of his appeal by the English High Court.
Patents
13 April 2022   The Federal Court of Australia has overturned its prior ruling that artificial intelligence (AI) can be a named inventor on a patent application, striking down the last year’s surprising win for Stephen Thaler and his ongoing AI inventorship campaign.