17 July 2015Patents

Unanswered questions after Huawei v ZTE, say lawyers

The Court of Justice of the European Union’s judgment in Huawei v ZTE provides a balance between standard-essential patent (SEP) owners’ and implementers’ interests, but has left questions unanswered, lawyers have told WIPR.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

Huawei v ZTE: No power abuse if SEP owner makes specific FRAND offer

16 July 2015 Europe’s highest court has said that owners of standard-essential patents should make a specific licensing offer on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms before seeking an injunction against the alleged infringement of a SEP.

Patents

LG and Motorola stung by patent claims

7 September 2016 A company called Uniloc has targeted a number of technology brands, including LG Electronics and Motorola, in patent infringement lawsuits.

On our radar...

Philip Morris case triggers AIPPI call for EPO action

Tourism’s influence on defining the ‘relevant public’ in EUTM oppositions

UK firms Venner Shipley and AA Thornton combine

UPDATED: German music rights body targets ChatGPT maker in ‘world first’

UPC docs 'excessively redacted' under GDPR claims transparency lawyer

L'Oréal sued over virtual makeup try-on simulator

Kathi Vidal to leave USPTO ahead of incoming Trump administration

Unanswered questions after Huawei v ZTE, say lawyers

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles