17 July 2015Patents

Unanswered questions after Huawei v ZTE, say lawyers

The Court of Justice of the European Union’s judgment in Huawei v ZTE provides a balance between standard-essential patent (SEP) owners’ and implementers’ interests, but has left questions unanswered, lawyers have told WIPR.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

Huawei v ZTE: No power abuse if SEP owner makes specific FRAND offer

16 July 2015 Europe’s highest court has said that owners of standard-essential patents should make a specific licensing offer on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms before seeking an injunction against the alleged infringement of a SEP.

Patents

LG and Motorola stung by patent claims

7 September 2016 A company called Uniloc has targeted a number of technology brands, including LG Electronics and Motorola, in patent infringement lawsuits.

Douwe Egberts enjoys double shot over Nestlé in coffee patent rivalry

Startup CFO’s betrayal is a lesson in preparing for the worst

President Trump 2.0: Five major areas to watch

Timing it right: When to raise issues in an IP dispute

PierFerd hires ‘standout’ prosecutor and AI expert

UK Budget: A missed opportunity?

InterDigital and OPPO cease global patent litigation

Never underestimate the ‘industry’ requirement in patent applications

Unanswered questions after Huawei v ZTE, say lawyers

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles