UPC’s ‘pro-transparency’ ruling welcomed—but does it go far enough?
Lawyers tell WIPR that “pro-transparency” decision still leaves “open questions” | Ruling doesn’t open the door to wide ranging requests for access to documents while legal proceedings are ongoing | Reaction from Freshfields, Powell Gilbert, Mathys & Squire.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
12 March 2024 Lawyer behind appeal says eagerly-anticipated hearing is “a long time coming” | Critics say UPC’s stance on access has not matched earlier expectations or promises and must be reviewed.
4 March 2024 Court confirms its tally of filings and actions since June opening | German location remains by far the most popular venue for litigation | Local Milan division receives three actions.
20 December 2024 WIPR has published Trademarks Rankings for this year highlighting top firms and practitioners in the US | New firms included in 2024 listing which covers contentious and non-contentious work.