4 July 2016Patents

WIPR survey: Readers split over Supreme Court’s Cuozzo ruling

Readers are divided over whether the US Supreme Court made the right decision when it upheld the claim construction standard used by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

SCOTUS Cuozzo decision may place ‘higher burden’ on patentees

21 June 2016 The US Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the claim construction standard that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board uses will place a “higher burden” on patentees, but uncertainty has been cleared up, lawyers have told WIPR.

Patents

US Supreme Court upholds BRI claim construction

20 June 2016 The US Supreme Court has upheld the claim construction that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) uses, affirming a ruling from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Patents

Cuozzo v Lee: SCOTUS ‘bothered’ by differing claim constructions, lawyers say

26 April 2016 US Supreme Court justices are “clearly bothered” by the fact that courts and the US Patent and Trademark Office reach different results depending on the standard of claim construction used, lawyers have told WIPR.

On our radar...

Philip Morris case triggers AIPPI call for EPO action

Penn State prevails in trademark dispute with Vintage Brand over retro logos

Google: Ex-engineer ‘touted dominion over the trade secrets he stole’

‘Trade secrets can be emotional’: Seth Gerber, Morgan Lewis

Private equity eyes controlling interest in Anaqua

Motorola can’t enforce ‘multiple’ US Hytera damages in UK

UK firms Venner Shipley and AA Thornton combine

WIPR survey: Readers split over Supreme Court’s Cuozzo ruling

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles