4 July 2016Patents

WIPR survey: Readers split over Supreme Court’s Cuozzo ruling

Readers are divided over whether the US Supreme Court made the right decision when it upheld the claim construction standard used by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

SCOTUS Cuozzo decision may place ‘higher burden’ on patentees

21 June 2016 The US Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the claim construction standard that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board uses will place a “higher burden” on patentees, but uncertainty has been cleared up, lawyers have told WIPR.

Patents

US Supreme Court upholds BRI claim construction

20 June 2016 The US Supreme Court has upheld the claim construction that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) uses, affirming a ruling from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Patents

Cuozzo v Lee: SCOTUS ‘bothered’ by differing claim constructions, lawyers say

26 April 2016 US Supreme Court justices are “clearly bothered” by the fact that courts and the US Patent and Trademark Office reach different results depending on the standard of claim construction used, lawyers have told WIPR.

On our radar…Qualcomm's chip win, TikTok secrets, Bitcoin claims

Leading US trademark firms and lawyers recognised in new national rankings

Huawei wins seven-country ban on Netgear routers at the UPC

Propel Fuels seeks top-up damages of $1.2bn in secrets case

Lenovo faces US import ban as ITC sides with Ericsson

Samsara v Motive: ‘Secrets case reads like a pulp novel’

USPTO sanctions attorney over sham Chinese TM filings

Arusha Protocol takes root: Fresh growth for plant variety protection in Africa

WIPR survey: Readers split over Supreme Court’s Cuozzo ruling

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles