4 July 2016Patents

WIPR survey: Readers split over Supreme Court’s Cuozzo ruling

Readers are divided over whether the US Supreme Court made the right decision when it upheld the claim construction standard used by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

SCOTUS Cuozzo decision may place ‘higher burden’ on patentees

21 June 2016 The US Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the claim construction standard that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board uses will place a “higher burden” on patentees, but uncertainty has been cleared up, lawyers have told WIPR.

Patents

US Supreme Court upholds BRI claim construction

20 June 2016 The US Supreme Court has upheld the claim construction that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) uses, affirming a ruling from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Patents

Cuozzo v Lee: SCOTUS ‘bothered’ by differing claim constructions, lawyers say

26 April 2016 US Supreme Court justices are “clearly bothered” by the fact that courts and the US Patent and Trademark Office reach different results depending on the standard of claim construction used, lawyers have told WIPR.

The new president will need to get tough on trade secrets

Timing it right: When to raise issues in an IP dispute

PierFerd hires ‘standout’ prosecutor and AI expert

Going off-track: NASCAR, DraftKings and NBA face down secrets theft

Steptoe bags major patent litigator

‘Works for hire’ exception takes centre stage in 2 Live Crew’s copyright victory

MetaBirkins appeal resurrects ‘fair use’ NFTs debate

Akerman hires licensing and litigation expert duo in New York

WIPR survey: Readers split over Supreme Court’s Cuozzo ruling

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles