‘A stunning warning for corporates’: How the Spaniels effect cost MGA $71m

The LOL Surprise! dolls case will have rights owners longing for the days when the First Amendment offered a broad defence. Muireann Bolger finds out why playtime is over for product lookalikes.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

Dogfight: Why US brands are taking on the First Amendment

7 September 2023 The Bad Spaniels case pitted the might of America Inc against a core principle of the US Constitution. Now that the country’s highest court has weighed in, what does this mean for brands?

Trademarks

Dogfight: SCOTUS favours big brands in JD’s First Amendment clash

9 June 2023 The Bad Spaniels case pitted the might of America Inc against a core principle of the US Constitution. Now that the country’s highest court has weighed in, what does this mean for brands?

German court convicts three people of fraud over ‘misleading’ IP invoices

From breaking barriers to sharing best practice: Themes from Marques

US court dismisses Kerrygold Irish butter claims

Insurance startup says AIG ‘throwing weight around’ with secrets lawsuit

K&L Gates adds ex-Corr Cronin litigator in Seattle

‘Paradise on Earth’: Hangzhou hosts AIPPI’s first China Congress

‘It’s hard to find the perfect counsel’: H&M head of IP Björn Norberg

Snap wins early trademark approval for ‘Spectacles’ smartglasses

‘A stunning warning for corporates’: How the Spaniels effect cost MGA $71m

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles