‘A stunning warning for corporates’: How the Spaniels effect cost MGA $71m

The LOL Surprise! dolls case will have rights owners longing for the days when the First Amendment offered a broad defence. Muireann Bolger finds out why playtime is over for product lookalikes.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

Dogfight: Why US brands are taking on the First Amendment

7 September 2023 The Bad Spaniels case pitted the might of America Inc against a core principle of the US Constitution. Now that the country’s highest court has weighed in, what does this mean for brands?

Trademarks

Dogfight: SCOTUS favours big brands in JD’s First Amendment clash

9 June 2023 The Bad Spaniels case pitted the might of America Inc against a core principle of the US Constitution. Now that the country’s highest court has weighed in, what does this mean for brands?

On our radar...

Penn State prevails in trademark dispute with Vintage Brand over retro logos

Google: Ex-engineer ‘touted dominion over the trade secrets he stole’

OpenAI faces first copyright suit in India over alleged scraping of news content

Tourism’s influence on defining the ‘relevant public’ in EUTM oppositions

‘Trade secrets can be emotional’: Seth Gerber, Morgan Lewis

Private equity eyes controlling interest in Anaqua

Motorola can’t enforce ‘multiple’ US Hytera damages in UK

‘A stunning warning for corporates’: How the Spaniels effect cost MGA $71m

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles