‘A stunning warning for corporates’: How the Spaniels effect cost MGA $71m

The LOL Surprise! dolls case will have rights owners longing for the days when the First Amendment offered a broad defence. Muireann Bolger finds out why playtime is over for product lookalikes.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

Dogfight: Why US brands are taking on the First Amendment

7 September 2023 The Bad Spaniels case pitted the might of America Inc against a core principle of the US Constitution. Now that the country’s highest court has weighed in, what does this mean for brands?

Trademarks

Dogfight: SCOTUS favours big brands in JD’s First Amendment clash

9 June 2023 The Bad Spaniels case pitted the might of America Inc against a core principle of the US Constitution. Now that the country’s highest court has weighed in, what does this mean for brands?

How to judge trademark infringement related to OEM

Apple fails to block cybersecurity company’s TM at IPOS

On our radar…Qualcomm's chip win, TikTok secrets, Bitcoin claims

Red Brand Chicken: A cautionary tale of bad faith and the EUIPO-EU General Court dynamic

Leading US trademark firms and lawyers recognised in new national rankings

Propel Fuels seeks top-up damages of $1.2bn in secrets case

E.l.f cleared of copycat claims in spat with Benefit Cosmetics

Lenovo faces US import ban as ITC sides with Ericsson

‘A stunning warning for corporates’: How the Spaniels effect cost MGA $71m

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles