18 October 2017Trademarks

H&M and Wildfox in trademark clash over fictitious basketball team

Clothing outlet H&M has asked the US District Court for the Southern District of New York to rule that a range of clothing using the name of fictitious basketball team ‘Wildfox’ does not infringe a rival’s trademark.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

H&M takes graffiti artist to court in copyright dispute

12 March 2018 Clothing retailer H&M has filed a complaint for declaratory judgment after being threatened with legal action over its use of graffiti art in a marketing campaign.

H&M withdraws complaint against graffiti artist

19 March 2018 Retailer H&M has announced the withdrawal of its complaint against a graffiti artist out of respect for the “creativity and uniqueness of artists”.

US govt to weigh in on H&M copyright dispute

13 October 2021 The US federal government will be allowed to present oral arguments in designer Unicolor’s suit against fashion retailer H&M, the US Supreme Court has determined.

Former executive ‘stole secret flavour formula’ for global drinks brand

SkyKicked: How a bad faith ruling put the boot into big brands

INTA announces 2025 president, updates TM guidelines, launches new 'Think Tank'

‘Sky acted in bad faith’: Supreme Court's ruling rattles TM owners

L'Oréal sued over virtual makeup try-on simulator

Kathi Vidal to leave USPTO ahead of incoming Trump administration

Huawei moves to strike out US trade secrets and fraud allegations

Q&A: EagleView counsel maps out route to IPR victory

H&M and Wildfox in trademark clash over fictitious basketball team

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles