18 October 2017Trademarks

H&M and Wildfox in trademark clash over fictitious basketball team

Clothing outlet H&M has asked the US District Court for the Southern District of New York to rule that a range of clothing using the name of fictitious basketball team ‘Wildfox’ does not infringe a rival’s trademark.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

H&M takes graffiti artist to court in copyright dispute

12 March 2018 Clothing retailer H&M has filed a complaint for declaratory judgment after being threatened with legal action over its use of graffiti art in a marketing campaign.

H&M withdraws complaint against graffiti artist

19 March 2018 Retailer H&M has announced the withdrawal of its complaint against a graffiti artist out of respect for the “creativity and uniqueness of artists”.

US govt to weigh in on H&M copyright dispute

13 October 2021 The US federal government will be allowed to present oral arguments in designer Unicolor’s suit against fashion retailer H&M, the US Supreme Court has determined.

Huawei wins seven-country ban on Netgear routers at the UPC

Propel Fuels seeks top-up damages of $1.2bn in secrets case

Leading US trademark firms and lawyers recognised in new national rankings

E.l.f cleared of copycat claims in spat with Benefit Cosmetics

Lenovo faces US import ban as ITC sides with Ericsson

Samsara v Motive: ‘Secrets case reads like a pulp novel’

USPTO sanctions attorney over sham Chinese TM filings

Aldi v Thatchers: Will UK appeal finally herd the copycats?

H&M and Wildfox in trademark clash over fictitious basketball team

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles