25 June 2019Trademarks

Iancu v Brunetti: A marker in the moral policing of IP, say lawyers

Lawyers have welcomed the US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the ban on scandalous and disparaging marks, after the court found yesterday, June 24, that it violated the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

Reclaiming language: are IP offices behind the times?

3 June 2020 Last year the UK Intellectual Property Office ran into the same problem that its US counterpart faced three years ago: what happens when the meaning of traditionally offensive or abusive terms changes, and how should IP offices react? Rory O’Neill reports.

Trademarks

‘Redskins’ name scrapped, but replacement in TM limbo: reports

13 July 2020 The Washington Redskins are dropping the highly contentious name, but its replacement is tied up in a “trademark battle”, it has been reported.

Patents

Iancu resigns, calls for end to ‘state-sponsored theft’

20 January 2021 US Patent and Trademark Office director Andrei Iancu confirmed his resignation with a rallying call for an end to state-sponsored theft and reform of patent eligibility.

INTA sets sights on MENA expansion

‘Large verdicts in trade secret cases will continue’: Randy Kay, Jones Day

WIPR to present report at WIPO event in Geneva

On our radar...

Penn State prevails in trademark dispute with Vintage Brand over retro logos

Google: Ex-engineer ‘touted dominion over the trade secrets he stole’

Tourism’s influence on defining the ‘relevant public’ in EUTM oppositions

‘Trade secrets can be emotional’: Seth Gerber, Morgan Lewis

Iancu v Brunetti: A marker in the moral policing of IP, say lawyers

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles