25 June 2019Trademarks

Iancu v Brunetti: A marker in the moral policing of IP, say lawyers

Lawyers have welcomed the US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the ban on scandalous and disparaging marks, after the court found yesterday, June 24, that it violated the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

Reclaiming language: are IP offices behind the times?

3 June 2020 Last year the UK Intellectual Property Office ran into the same problem that its US counterpart faced three years ago: what happens when the meaning of traditionally offensive or abusive terms changes, and how should IP offices react? Rory O’Neill reports.

Trademarks

‘Redskins’ name scrapped, but replacement in TM limbo: reports

13 July 2020 The Washington Redskins are dropping the highly contentious name, but its replacement is tied up in a “trademark battle”, it has been reported.

Patents

Iancu resigns, calls for end to ‘state-sponsored theft’

20 January 2021 US Patent and Trademark Office director Andrei Iancu confirmed his resignation with a rallying call for an end to state-sponsored theft and reform of patent eligibility.

How to judge trademark infringement related to OEM

Apple fails to block cybersecurity company’s TM at IPOS

On our radar…Qualcomm's chip win, TikTok secrets, Bitcoin claims

Red Brand Chicken: A cautionary tale of bad faith and the EUIPO-EU General Court dynamic

Leading US trademark firms and lawyers recognised in new national rankings

Propel Fuels seeks top-up damages of $1.2bn in secrets case

E.l.f cleared of copycat claims in spat with Benefit Cosmetics

Lenovo faces US import ban as ITC sides with Ericsson

Iancu v Brunetti: A marker in the moral policing of IP, say lawyers

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles