24 April 2020TrademarksRory O'Neill

Romag v Fossil: a ‘pro-brand’ ruling, say lawyers

Yesterday’s US Supreme Court ruling in Romag v Fossil is the latest effort to erase categorical rules on remedies for IP infringement, lawyers have told WIPR.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

SCOTUS grapples with ‘wilfulness’ in TM infringement

15 January 2020 US Supreme Court justices presiding over a closely-watched case are so far struggling with the notion of “wilfulness” as a requirement for awarding profits in trademark infringement cases.

Trademarks

SCOTUS preview: justices consider profits awards for TM infringement

10 January 2020 The US Supreme Court is set to hear arguments next week in a key dispute that is likely to have ramifications for what remedies courts can apply for trademark infringement.

Propel Fuels seeks top-up damages of $1.2bn in secrets case

Leading US trademark firms and lawyers recognised in new national rankings

E.l.f cleared of copycat claims in spat with Benefit Cosmetics

Lenovo faces US import ban as ITC sides with Ericsson

Samsara v Motive: ‘Secrets case reads like a pulp novel’

USPTO sanctions attorney over sham Chinese TM filings

Aldi v Thatchers: Will UK appeal finally herd the copycats?

Peanut the squirrel (RIP) leaps on the meme coin bandwagon

Romag v Fossil: a ‘pro-brand’ ruling, say lawyers

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles