24 April 2020TrademarksRory O'Neill

Romag v Fossil: a ‘pro-brand’ ruling, say lawyers

Yesterday’s US Supreme Court ruling in Romag v Fossil is the latest effort to erase categorical rules on remedies for IP infringement, lawyers have told WIPR.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

SCOTUS grapples with ‘wilfulness’ in TM infringement

15 January 2020 US Supreme Court justices presiding over a closely-watched case are so far struggling with the notion of “wilfulness” as a requirement for awarding profits in trademark infringement cases.

Trademarks

SCOTUS preview: justices consider profits awards for TM infringement

10 January 2020 The US Supreme Court is set to hear arguments next week in a key dispute that is likely to have ramifications for what remedies courts can apply for trademark infringement.

Penn State prevails in trademark dispute with Vintage Brand over retro logos

Google: Ex-engineer ‘touted dominion over the trade secrets he stole’

Tourism’s influence on defining the ‘relevant public’ in EUTM oppositions

‘Trade secrets can be emotional’: Seth Gerber, Morgan Lewis

Private equity eyes controlling interest in Anaqua

Motorola can’t enforce ‘multiple’ US Hytera damages in UK

UK firms Venner Shipley and AA Thornton combine

Kathi Vidal to rejoin previous firm as partner following USPTO departure

Romag v Fossil: a ‘pro-brand’ ruling, say lawyers

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles