SCOTUS sidesteps key corporate damages questions in Dewberry case

The court’s reversal of a controversial $43 million award left questions on corporate veil liability unanswered—but why? Muireann Bolger explores a must-know case for US in-house counsel.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

TM decision ‘will harm America’s economy’ if SCOTUS upholds

6 September 2024 Washington Legal Foundation files amicus brief supporting Dewberry Group | Brief argues controversial inclusion of corporate affiliates' profits in infringement damages misinterprets US trademark law | Decision could alter how companies structure their operations, says WLF.

Trademarks Channel

‘It’s not for us’: SCOTUS wary of widening damages net in Dewberry

12 December 2024 Justices consider whether plaintiffs can indirectly “pierce the corporate veil” and look to corporate affiliates when seeking trademark damages | Case interrogates reach and scope of Lanham Act | Justices confused by dearth of clarity in oral arguments, may remand controversial case to lower court.

Lenovo’s landmark SEP win ‘a potentially powerful remedy’ for implementers

Paul Hastings adds Latham tech transactions expert as co-chair

Amy Candido joins Simpson Thacher to head ‘powerhouse litigation team’

Fed Circ denies Micron petition over source code discovery

‘This has sent shockwaves’: BSH v Electrolux lights up Europe

Your next opportunity for a dotBrand is approaching: Where do you even start?

BSH v Electrolux: Cross-border patent enforcement without invalidity risks

Fed Circ ruling opens ITC door to small corporations

SCOTUS sidesteps key corporate damages questions in Dewberry case

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles