SCOTUS sidesteps key corporate damages questions in Dewberry case

The court’s reversal of a controversial $43 million award left questions on corporate veil liability unanswered—but why? Muireann Bolger explores a must-know case for US in-house counsel.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

TM decision ‘will harm America’s economy’ if SCOTUS upholds

6 September 2024 Washington Legal Foundation files amicus brief supporting Dewberry Group | Brief argues controversial inclusion of corporate affiliates' profits in infringement damages misinterprets US trademark law | Decision could alter how companies structure their operations, says WLF.

Trademarks Channel

‘It’s not for us’: SCOTUS wary of widening damages net in Dewberry

12 December 2024 Justices consider whether plaintiffs can indirectly “pierce the corporate veil” and look to corporate affiliates when seeking trademark damages | Case interrogates reach and scope of Lanham Act | Justices confused by dearth of clarity in oral arguments, may remand controversial case to lower court.

Biscoff maker's EU red and white colour mark crumbles

Robinsons takes action against Aldi in wake of Thatchers ruling

Quarles & Brady boosts tech and data privacy offering in IP group

Is Tapestry’s Shein lawsuit over Coach TMs a gamechanger for fast fashion?

7 things to consider before buying IP technology

Blank Rome adds ‘dedicated’ patent litigator in Texas

Polsinelli boosts litigation team with DC hire

Leading TM law firms and lawyers recognised in new UK rankings

SCOTUS sidesteps key corporate damages questions in Dewberry case

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles