SCOTUS sidesteps key corporate damages questions in Dewberry case

The court’s reversal of a controversial $43 million award left questions on corporate veil liability unanswered—but why? Muireann Bolger explores a must-know case for US in-house counsel.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks Channel

‘It’s not for us’: SCOTUS wary of widening damages net in Dewberry

12 December 2024 Justices consider whether plaintiffs can indirectly “pierce the corporate veil” and look to corporate affiliates when seeking trademark damages | Case interrogates reach and scope of Lanham Act | Justices confused by dearth of clarity in oral arguments, may remand controversial case to lower court.

Trademarks

TM decision ‘will harm America’s economy’ if SCOTUS upholds

6 September 2024 Washington Legal Foundation files amicus brief supporting Dewberry Group | Brief argues controversial inclusion of corporate affiliates' profits in infringement damages misinterprets US trademark law | Decision could alter how companies structure their operations, says WLF.

WATCH: Resolve IP disputes on a budget: cost-effective strategies for success

‘Now is the time to scale rapidly’: Microsoft supports AI patent tool

Venable acquires accomplished IP trial lawyer for San Fran office

USPTO speeds up patent issuance amid widespread agency changes

Consulting firm adds economic analysts to its IP group

Why recent ITC rulings are good news for SEP owners and the Commission

Nokia intensifies global patent fight with ITC complaint against Asus, Acer, and Hisense

Baker McKenzie strengthens litigation offering with new hire

SCOTUS sidesteps key corporate damages questions in Dewberry case

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles