• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
  • In-house
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Global In-House Elite 2026
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Japan considers copyright law extension
12 July 2013Copyright

Japan considers copyright law extension

The Japanese government is considering making changes to its copyright law which could see authors of protected works retain rights for an extra 20 years.

Current law provides protection for an author’s life plus 50 years after its death, but proposals have been made to extend the period to 70 years.

If implemented, the changes would protect songwriters, composers and music publishers, and would bring Japan’s copyright law in line with legislation in the US and EU.

The proposals stem from Japan’s desire to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a free trade agreement between countries in the pacific region currently under negotiation and being spearheaded by the US.

According to Kensaku Takase, partner at the Tokyo office of Baker & McKenzie LLP, the US is understood to have been pressuring participating countries to strengthen their IP laws.

The Japanese Society for Rights of Authors, Composers and Publishers are among the groups that have been lobbying for an extension to copyright laws but, according to Yasufumi Shiroyama, partner at Anderson Mori & Tomotsune, the proposed changes are due to a desire to join the TPP and not pressure from lobbyists.

Expressing concern at the TPP model, Takase said: “It [TPP] is not a copyright treaty – it is a trade treaty with its main focus being agricultural trade. As such, the fact that copyright aspects have been introduced to negotiations is seen by some as being a way of implementing preferences which would benefit one country’s copyright industries over another.

“The danger for a US copyright holder [under current Japanese laws] would be that their copyright in one country would have expired earlier than other countries.”

Despite admitting that the proposals would improve trade, Takase conceded that they are “only a fraction” of the changes needed across Japan’s IP law to make it consistent with the US and EU.

“Japanese laws, especially in the IP arena, are unique. The more aligned Japan can get its laws with the US and EU, the much easier it will be for IP to be traded,” he said.

“There will still remain a significant number of differences. There is isolated focus on copyright and no focus on other areas of IP law which logically should also be addressed, such as trademark law.”

Countries participating in current TPP negotiations include: Australia, Brunei, Chile, Canada, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the US and Vietnam.

After a final decision is taken by Japan, changes could be implemented within a year.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk




Editor's picks

World IP Review launches Global In-House Elite 2026
In-House
World IP Review launches Global In-House Elite 2026
27 March 2026

Editor's picks

In-House
World IP Review launches Global In-House Elite 2026
27 March 2026
AI
UK kicks the AI copyright can down the road: 5 takeaways for business
20 March 2026
AI
UK makes U-turn as government drops AI copyright exception
18 March 2026
Trademarks
Who owns a name? Katy Perry, Estée Lauder and Jo Malone test rights
16 March 2026
Trade secrets
How we won: The irony of a trade secrets courtroom exposé
16 March 2026
Trademarks
INTA: ‘New normal’ for in-house counsel as budgets fall
13 March 2026

More articles

Cox v Sony: SCOTUS trims ISP liability in ‘seismic decision’
McGuireWoods adds nationally recognised litigator from Fried, Frank
UK kicks the AI copyright can down the road: 5 takeaways for business
WIPO launches initiative to evolve IP infrastructure in age of AI
UK makes U-turn as government drops AI copyright exception
Britannica sues OpenAI over ‘cannibalising’ traffic
Taylor Wessing boosts London practice with another RPC alumnus
IP Europe appoints ex-Walt Disney policy and advocacy expert

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin