4 December 2020PatentsMuireann Bolger

Apple and Intel weigh in on SCOTUS Arthrex review

Apple and Intel, along with tech and IP groups, are urging the US Supreme Court to retain an administrative process for challenging patents.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

Arthrex: ‘patents have become more political’

22 June 2021 In a decision highly anticipated by patent owners, the US Supreme Court has delivered its final ruling in US v Arthrex—a fractured opinion that lawyers say leaves burning questions around its political implications.

Patents

USPTO reveals post-Arthrex review process

30 June 2021 As a result of the recent Supreme Court decision in US v Arthrex, the US Patent and Trademark Office issued new interim procedures on Tuesday, June 29, that give the office’s director the authority to rehear final Patent Trial and Appeal Board rulings.

Patents

Rejected post-Arthrex bids signal uncertainty over USPTO director’s authority

5 August 2021 Early signs show that US v Arthrex is unlikely to herald a spate of inter partes reviews, but may fuel uncertainty around the scope of the acting USPTO director’s role, lawyers have told WIPR.

Penn State prevails in trademark dispute with Vintage Brand over retro logos

Google: Ex-engineer ‘touted dominion over the trade secrets he stole’

‘Trade secrets can be emotional’: Seth Gerber, Morgan Lewis

Private equity eyes controlling interest in Anaqua

Motorola can’t enforce ‘multiple’ US Hytera damages in UK

UK firms Venner Shipley and AA Thornton combine

Kathi Vidal to rejoin previous firm as partner following USPTO departure

Around the world with trade secrets

Apple and Intel weigh in on SCOTUS Arthrex review

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles