shutterstock_1169047330_mark_van_scyoc
5 August 2021PatentsMuireann Bolger

Rejected post-Arthrex bids signal uncertainty over USPTO director’s authority

Early signs show that US v Arthrex is unlikely to herald a spate of inter partes reviews, but may fuel uncertainty around the scope of the acting USPTO director’s role, lawyers have told WIPR.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
4 December 2020   Apple and Intel, along with tech and IP groups, are urging the US Supreme Court to retain an administrative process for challenging patents.
Patents
24 March 2020   The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will leave it to the Supreme Court to review its controversial Arthrex decision that Patent Trial and Appeal Board judges were unconstitutionally appointed.
Patents
20 December 2022   The temporary director’s authority was challenged | Question mark over constitutionality of granted director reviews | SCOTUS.