14 August 2015Patents

Federal Circuit reinstates $45m Akamai v Limelight ruling

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has reinstated the $45.5 million damages award in the Akamai v Limelight dispute after it ruled en banc that Limelight is liable for direct infringement.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

US court says Limelight did not infringe Akamai patent

14 May 2015 An appeals court has upheld a US Supreme Court ruling in the Akamai v Limelight case stating that Limelight is not liable for patent infringement because multiple parties had performed different steps of the infringement.

Patents

Damages in Akamai v Limelight agreed at $51m

6 July 2016 A US court has entered its final judgment in a long-running patent infringement dispute between Limelight Networks and Akamai Technologies with the final damages total standing $12 million below the agreed maximum threshold.

Hytera admits it stole Motorola’s trade secrets in case tied to DoJ charge

Will Walmart’s Birkin gambit be worth it in the end?

On our radar… Nvidia’s trade secret spat, Huawei settlement, and AI copyright cases

K&L Gates adds litigator in Melbourne

BakerHostetler adds experienced partner in Washington, DC

Nike sprints ahead in shoe patent race

How cautionary notices protect IP across Africa

‘Bleeding’ plant burger company dines out on EU patent win

Federal Circuit reinstates $45m Akamai v Limelight ruling

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles