22 August 2022FeaturesTrademarksOlivier Vrins

Monster v Red Bull: ‘intention’ in the dock

A legal battle between two of the world’s most popular energy drinks threw up some interesting points of argument earlier this month.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

Monster ‘reigns’ in trademark dispute, rules 11th Circ

4 August 2022 Energy drinks brand claims victory over packaging dispute | “Hard-fought case” ends with defendant’s claims of infringement being “totally debunked” | Knobbe Martens.

Trademarks

Big Horn infringed Red Bull trademarks, English High Court finds

5 February 2020 Red Bull’s trademark was infringed by energy drink maker Big Horn, the English High Court has ruled, stating that Big Horn’s logo was similar enough to Red Bull’s for a consumer to assume there was a connection between the two companies.

Leading US trademark firms and lawyers recognised in new national rankings

E.l.f cleared of copycat claims in spat with Benefit Cosmetics

USPTO sanctions attorney over sham Chinese TM filings

Aldi v Thatchers: Will UK appeal finally herd the copycats?

Peanut the squirrel (RIP) leaps on the meme coin bandwagon

INTA joins calls for EU to prioritise IP crime in security initiative

‘It’s not for us’: SCOTUS wary of widening damages net in Dewberry

Lego scores dual win at EUIPO

Monster v Red Bull: ‘intention’ in the dock

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles