22 August 2022FeaturesTrademarksOlivier Vrins

Monster v Red Bull: ‘intention’ in the dock

A legal battle between two of the world’s most popular energy drinks threw up some interesting points of argument earlier this month.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

Monster ‘reigns’ in trademark dispute, rules 11th Circ

4 August 2022 Energy drinks brand claims victory over packaging dispute | “Hard-fought case” ends with defendant’s claims of infringement being “totally debunked” | Knobbe Martens.

Trademarks

Big Horn infringed Red Bull trademarks, English High Court finds

5 February 2020 Red Bull’s trademark was infringed by energy drink maker Big Horn, the English High Court has ruled, stating that Big Horn’s logo was similar enough to Red Bull’s for a consumer to assume there was a connection between the two companies.

Penn State prevails in trademark dispute with Vintage Brand over retro logos

Tourism’s influence on defining the ‘relevant public’ in EUTM oppositions

UK firms Venner Shipley and AA Thornton combine

SkyKicked: How a bad faith ruling put the boot into big brands

INTA announces 2025 president, updates TM guidelines, launches new 'Think Tank'

‘Sky acted in bad faith’: Supreme Court's ruling rattles TM owners

Kathi Vidal to leave USPTO ahead of incoming Trump administration

WIPO in Saudi Arabia to finalise design law treaty

Monster v Red Bull: ‘intention’ in the dock

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles