11 August 2015Trademarks
US trademarks: Walking the line on free speech
Taken at face value, the terms ‘redskins’ and ‘slants’ are likely to cause offence.
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
Trademarks
11 May 2015 More than half of respondents to a WIPR survey have said that the US Patent and Trademark Office was right to reject trademark applications on the grounds that they were “disparaging”.
Trademarks
9 February 2015 A US politician has introduced a bill that would officially declare the word ‘redskin’ offensive and make it impossible to register it as a trademark, despite there being a pending lawsuit covering similar issues.
Trademarks
25 January 2016 The US Patent and Trademark Office has said an appeal court’s decision to strike out the disparagement provision in the Lanham Act by ruling in favour of US band The Slants also wipes out provisions barring the registration of scandalous and immoral trademarks.