WIPR survey: Majority back USPTO over ‘disparaging’ trademark rulings

More than half of respondents to a WIPR survey have said that the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) was right to reject trademark applications on the grounds that they were “disparaging”.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

US trademarks: Walking the line on free speech

11 August 2015 The Redskins and the Slants cases, which centre on whether potentially offensive words can be trademarked, are making their way through the US courts, with the First Amendment likely to play a part. WIPR reports.

Trademarks

USPTO: ‘The Slants’ decision extends to scandalous and immoral TMs

25 January 2016 The US Patent and Trademark Office has said an appeal court’s decision to strike out the disparagement provision in the Lanham Act by ruling in favour of US band The Slants also wipes out provisions barring the registration of scandalous and immoral trademarks.

On our radar...

Penn State prevails in trademark dispute with Vintage Brand over retro logos

Google: Ex-engineer ‘touted dominion over the trade secrets he stole’

Tourism’s influence on defining the ‘relevant public’ in EUTM oppositions

‘Trade secrets can be emotional’: Seth Gerber, Morgan Lewis

Private equity eyes controlling interest in Anaqua

Motorola can’t enforce ‘multiple’ US Hytera damages in UK

UK firms Venner Shipley and AA Thornton combine

WIPR survey: Majority back USPTO over ‘disparaging’ trademark rulings

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles